I can only support the previous posts. Please bring the old version back or something equivalent.
best regards
Peter
I can only support the previous posts. Please bring the old version back or something equivalent.
best regards
Peter
See this post for instance, which was posted just 5h before your post.
best regards
Peter
@Suty Thank you for the quick rensponse. I tried it right now and I was able to replicate it. This time I tried it somewhere else and with a shorter route. And while doing so I found something new. While using my new shorter test-route it always occured when the route got longer than 100km. In the following picture the route is just above 100km and there are no clouds showing.

In the next picture the lenght of the route is shown as exactly 100km and the clouds are there.

But that seems to be not the whole story, because my original route was always significantly longer than 100km and had problems as well. When I increase the length of a similar shorter test-route, which has the same Problem at 100km, even more (to somewhere in the low 200km), the clouds appear again (did not capture a picture). It seems to me that they dissapear an come back several times when increasing the length of the route. Concerning the replication of the bug, I can't replicate it consistently. I don't know what the route really needs to look like to have this behaviour. I try one or two routes and then I usually get another one with this behaviour.
best regards
Peter
When I check the wind forecast on my phone I can only see about three days into the future, but on desktop way longer (see screenshots). Is this a bug, or what am I doing wrong?


I am using:
best regards
Peter
@Suty It seems fixed now, thank you.
best regards
Peter
@Suty It seems fixed now, thank you.
best regards
Peter
@Suty It seems fixed now, thank you.
best regards
Peter
@Suty It seems fixed now, thank you.
best regards
Peter
@Wheats said in Cloud base in meteogram does not correspond to cloud base in map:
I think you should clarify your questions friend.
Yes, my post includes two questions. They are listed in your answer nicely. I think I was quite clear, but nevertheless thanks for clarifying.
I think question number 1 is already answered. There is no cloud base according to the map layer, when the weather picker says "Data not available for this location".
- Do we interpret "Data not available for this location" as
- there is no cloud base?
or- data is not available for this location? (ie there may be a cloud base but it's just not available for this location).
I think question number 2 is still open.
- Why doesn't the map layer "Cloud Base" and meteogram "Cloud Base" match?
- Why is there no data available on the map layer, but the meteogram shows 200m or less (0 pink and 200 red colouring)?
@idefix37 said in Cloud base in meteogram does not correspond to cloud base in map:
Your screenshot doesn't answer your questions.
What does this even mean? Of course my screenshot does not answer my question. It is the visual part of the question.
In your screenshot, we can't see the current time.
In my screenshot the time slider is clearly visible.
@Wheats said in Cloud base in meteogram does not correspond to cloud base in map:
I don't know if this is the original intent of the post - but I'm curious to learn why there is no cloud base in the map but there is in the meteogram row.
Yes, this is my main question and the original intent of my post.
@idefix37 said in Cloud base in meteogram does not correspond to cloud base in map:
[...] cloud bases so geometric?
I was wondering that too.

best regards
Peter
@idefix37 I think this post does not explain the difference between the map and the meteogram. It explains why the numeric cloud base values at the bottom of the meteogram and the 2D meteogram view differ. The 2D view shows the relative humidity in the atmosphere and the cloud base is taken directly from the ECMWF model. When I view the cloud base layer and select the ECMWF model, I expect to get the same data as in the bottom line of the meteogram, just displayed differently. In the map, it is displayed across an area for a fixed point in time and at the bottom of the meteogram it is displayed across a time period for a fixed point in space. My question does not relate to the 2D view of the humidity in the meteogram.
best regards
Peter
@Suty I have just checked and it happens in my phone's Chrome browser too. Same crashing behaviour. Chrome browser version is 145.0.7632.120.
best regards
Peter
Any help on this?
best regards
Peter
When I click the "Premium" button on the home screen and scroll through the list of favourites and planned routes, the windy map crashes immediately (see screenshot) and the error console yields an error (see code). I can't say for sure, but I think it started just recently.
I am using:

{
"errorID": "canvas-context-is-lost",
"overlay": "wind",
"runningPhase": "3_redrawFinished",
"timestamp": 1772448899089,
"runningMinutes": 4,
"type": "customLogError",
"msg": "Canvas context is lost",
"url": "https://app-webview.windy.com/#/favs?48.398,13.580,5,p:favs",
"ver": "49.0.1",
"target": "mobile",
"platform": "android",
"device": "mobile",
"latestBcast": "render: contextLost (2ms ago at 1772448899087)
bcast: glContextLost (2ms ago at 1772448899087)",
"network": {
"downlink": 10,
"downlinkMax": null,
"effectiveType": "4g",
"rtt": 0,
"saveData": false,
"type": "wifi"
},
"module": "map"
}
best regards
Peter
See this post for instance, which was posted just 5h before your post.
best regards
Peter
Why is there a difference for the cloud base depicted in the bottom line of the meteogram and the map? Both are labeled with "Cloud base", but don't match. In the city of Salzburg the meteogram shows 200m or less starting at 7:00 a.m. for friday and the map just shows "Data not available for this location". Why is the map not colored accordingly, because the data seems to be there? See screenshot.
The map often shows that there is no data available for cloud base. Because this corresponds with no coloring on the map (and good weather), I always assumed that "Data not available for this location" in the context of cloud base just means that the model says there is no cloud base. Similarly to visibility in aviation weather reports, where "visibility > 10km" is used for superb visibilities greater than 10km, where the precise value does not matter and is not given. On the other hand taken "Data not available for this location" literally the cloud base could be anything. How does this work and should be interpreted?
I would be greatful for some help in understanding this issues and probable limitations of the models etc. that cause this confusion.

best regards
Peter
@Suty it is broken again, but not consistently. I haven't spotted the pattern when it's broken and when it's working yet. Last time I checked during night time, it did not work. See screenshot.

best regards
Peter