Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. pln38
    P
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 1
    • Groups 0

    pln38

    @pln38

    1
    Reputation
    5
    Profile views
    1
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    pln38 Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by pln38

    • RE: AROME altitude layers : a survey

      Merci Victor pour ce super outils , oui Arome serait un GROS plus.

      Par contre meteo-parapente.com n'utilise pas Arome a ma connaissance, mais un dérivé de WRF (mais le futur site de NicolasB. oui par contre: Wetter.aero )


      Meteo-Parapente runs it's own NWP model, which have been specifically tuned for soaring.
      The resolution is approximately 2.5km for the central zone and 7.5km for the dashed outer zone.

      The model runs on a HPC supercomputer, just like the ones you find at NASA. (ours is slightly smaller 😉 but we still have a huge electricity bill)

      The core of the model is based on a modified version of the WRF-ARW and custom software that have been freely inspired from DrJack's RASP Blipmaps.

      The initial and boundary conditions (=input data) comes from the GFS coupled to a lot of others datasets (NOAA, NASA, USGS, Copernicus, DWD, Météo-France...).

      posted in Your Feedback and Suggestions
      P
      pln38

    Latest posts made by pln38

    • RE: AROME altitude layers : a survey

      Merci Victor pour ce super outils , oui Arome serait un GROS plus.

      Par contre meteo-parapente.com n'utilise pas Arome a ma connaissance, mais un dérivé de WRF (mais le futur site de NicolasB. oui par contre: Wetter.aero )


      Meteo-Parapente runs it's own NWP model, which have been specifically tuned for soaring.
      The resolution is approximately 2.5km for the central zone and 7.5km for the dashed outer zone.

      The model runs on a HPC supercomputer, just like the ones you find at NASA. (ours is slightly smaller 😉 but we still have a huge electricity bill)

      The core of the model is based on a modified version of the WRF-ARW and custom software that have been freely inspired from DrJack's RASP Blipmaps.

      The initial and boundary conditions (=input data) comes from the GFS coupled to a lot of others datasets (NOAA, NASA, USGS, Copernicus, DWD, Météo-France...).

      posted in Your Feedback and Suggestions
      P
      pln38