Agree with Demetris. The pictorial icons don't add value. They make the interface more difficult to navigate. Please return to the old format.

@Suty I prefer the original UI. It was easy to navigate and had very useful features that have been dropped. Some specifics: the pictorial icons are meaningless. Use simple monochrome icons that represent the function and are easy to identify. Also, keep the icon background solid so that the text can be easily read. Text with the transparent background overlaps map text and is difficult to read. There are many other design problems related to navigation and ease of use. Basically you've taken a really good UI and turned it into a visual circus.

@Suty I prefer the original UI. It was easy to navigate and had very useful features that have been dropped. Some specifics: the pictorial icons are meaningless. Use simple monochrome icons that represent the function and are easy to identify. Also, keep the icon background solid so that the text can be easily read. Text with the transparent background overlaps map text and is difficult to read. There are many other design problems related to navigation and ease of use. Basically you've taken a really good UI and turned it into a visual circus.

Agree with Demetris. The pictorial icons don't add value. They make the interface more difficult to navigate. Please return to the old format.