In the mobile application, the real time sounding is not anymore accessible, only the models are showing up. This seems an error as the scrolling down - like in the browser version - is not posible in the android version.

@Meteo-Maresme-Meteorológia-catalana said in New sounding with radiosonde measurements:

La raya intermitente es la adiabatica seca verdad?

La línea verde discontinua en la zona inferior es la adiabática seca, en la zona superior, donde está el pliegue, es la adiabática húmeda.

In the mobile App, the aerologie is limited to the models but the actual sounding is not anymore available. In the browser version one migh scroll down to "Nearest sounding" but in the mobile app, the scrolling is not posible.

It would be nice to make the real data again accessible in the mobile app. Thank you.

I saw, that the posible forecast for meteorological soundings (Aerology) in now only 5 days in ECMWF and GFS models. Clicking day 6 till 9 in the timeline continuously displays day 5. As there is no time and date of the forecast displayd map itself. This could easily lead into confusion.
As I am working intensly with the soundings in order to write local weather forecasts, I would apreciate having them calculated over the whole timeline displayd, which is currently 9 days for ECMWF and GFS. If not posible, the day and time for the calculated forecast in the map itself would be appreciated.

Tapping on the back botton of the telephone let the timeline dissapearing. Did not found a method to recover other than closing and reopening the app. This is a bit annoying.

Sometimes the lower timeline dissapears. This happens when I tap on a map, then open Aerology and then changing Model from the selected to another one. Sometimes, it also dissapears only after selecting aerology and then returning.

Can't find any possibility to rebuild it than leaving the program and restarting it again.

As a resident of the iland La Palma, I am currently also interested in SO2 reports. You are forecasting for today values of 125 mg/m2, don't think this is correct. It might rather be read as 125 ug/m3. Could you check on this item? Thank you very much.