@Gkikas-LGPZ Hi, yes you are true that it should be more general. We are going to remove that limit in some future release.

@Benj5612 Hi, this colouring is intended to determine low/high clouds. Low clouds are yellow, high clouds are blue/white. Could you please share a link to colouring that you mentioned?

@Gkikas-LGPZ And I am happy that you find it useful. I have a list of improvements for the sounding graph, but unfortunately it has small priority now.

@Gkikas-LGPZ Hi, I appologize for the delay. My colleague is now working on another upper air task, so he also will add the 250h layer for sounding. If everything goes well, it should be done during this week.

@Gkikas-LGPZ Hi, thank you for your feedback, we will discuss it. I do not know if there is a general approach/formula for recalculating IR intensity to cloud temperature.

@cloud-maven1 Hi, unfortunately it is not possible now. I admit, that it is not always suitable to have one global limit.

@HavalarinSesi Thank you for your feedback! In our survey much more people voted for the rainbow palette so we put it back.

@koko_a Hi, thank you for your feedback! This is a compromise solution. We moved the line because of hurricanes in the Atlantic ocean - they were often split. So now whole ocean is covered by one Goes satellite. I admit that the resolution is slightly worse near its eastern edge. We are thinking also about single satellite mode, so you would be able to choose just one satellite that you want to see.

@Evil Isolines should disappear, because it is forecast for "some hour in future". Radar is history. So we decided to turn them off when you change to radar.

@Edgington Hi, this is probably because of different calculation of both values.
Cloud base is directly taken from ECMWF parameter called "ceiling". It is height (above model orography i.e. AGL) of cloud layer covering more than 50% of the sky. It estimates height where you can expect "significant clouds". Detailed description is here: https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/FCST/43r1+new+parameters%3A+Ceiling
On the other side the grey meteogram is calculated from relative humidity. It can be explained as a distribution of water in the atmosphere. The height in the meteogram is in pressure levels. km/ft values are only rough estimation and they are AMSL. I admit that this can be confusing.
Possible explanation of the difference: There could be signigicant humidity (almost 100%), so there are drawn clouds in meteogram, but the cloud coverage according to ECMWF is less than 50%, so the ceiling is considered to be higher.
In such strange case it is better to look also in cloud maps, which can give you better overview. However, if the location is in the mountains then the values can be misleading, because model orography is very rough.