# Difference between revisions of "LBNL-2016: Inflation Summary"

From CMB-S4 wiki

Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 24: | Line 24: | ||

==Currently needed== | ==Currently needed== | ||

− | + | ||

* Realistic forecasts for: | * Realistic forecasts for: | ||

** tensor-to-scalar ratio (first version from Victor Buza, Colin Bischoff, John Kovac in the draft) | ** tensor-to-scalar ratio (first version from Victor Buza, Colin Bischoff, John Kovac in the draft) | ||

− | ** tensor spectral index | + | ** tensor spectral index, running |

** scalar spectral index, running | ** scalar spectral index, running | ||

** non-Gaussianity, including BBB | ** non-Gaussianity, including BBB | ||

+ | * Section on isocurvature modes | ||

+ | * Additional discussion on bispectrum | ||

+ | * Discussion of trispectrum | ||

+ | * Streamline various sections | ||

==Open questions== | ==Open questions== | ||

− | * Should the inflation chapter | + | Bigger picture questions |

+ | * Should the inflation chapter be thought of as independent at some level? If so, it should likely include higher level discussion | ||

+ | * CMB-S4 can only reach theoretically well motivated thresholds for r. As a consequence r is the main inflationary driver of the design, and the chapter is focused on primordial gravitational waves. Other aspects imply CMB-S4 will have high angular resolution. Should the discussion of constraints on the power spectrum, bispectrum,... be expanded? | ||

+ | * Should the inflation chapter be focused on inflation or include implications of high-scale inflation for other areas of fundamental physics? | ||

+ | |||

+ | More detailed questions | ||

+ | * How much time and effort should be spent on strawman models that produce B-mode power in excess of the inflationary signal? | ||

+ | * Should various sections be moved or remain in the inflation chapter? | ||

+ | ** Constraints on the graviton | ||

+ | ** Birefringence | ||

## Revision as of 14:14, 7 March 2016

## Status of Inflation Chapter

- Introduction
- Implications of a detection of primordial gravitational waves with CMB-S4
- The energy scale of inflation
- Planckian field ranges and symmetries
- Constraints on the graviton mass
- Following up on a detection

- Lessons from upper limits
- CMB data products and simulations to achieve goals for PGW
- Improved constraints on primordial density perturbations
- The power spectrum of primordial density perturbations
- Higher order correlations
- Isocurvature

- Constraints on curvature, cosmic birefringence, cosmic strings, axions,...
- Spatial curvature
- Cosmic Birefringence
- Cosmic Strings
- Anomalies

- Summary

## Currently needed

- Realistic forecasts for:
- tensor-to-scalar ratio (first version from Victor Buza, Colin Bischoff, John Kovac in the draft)
- tensor spectral index, running
- scalar spectral index, running
- non-Gaussianity, including BBB

- Section on isocurvature modes
- Additional discussion on bispectrum
- Discussion of trispectrum
- Streamline various sections

## Open questions

Bigger picture questions

- Should the inflation chapter be thought of as independent at some level? If so, it should likely include higher level discussion
- CMB-S4 can only reach theoretically well motivated thresholds for r. As a consequence r is the main inflationary driver of the design, and the chapter is focused on primordial gravitational waves. Other aspects imply CMB-S4 will have high angular resolution. Should the discussion of constraints on the power spectrum, bispectrum,... be expanded?
- Should the inflation chapter be focused on inflation or include implications of high-scale inflation for other areas of fundamental physics?

More detailed questions

- How much time and effort should be spent on strawman models that produce B-mode power in excess of the inflationary signal?
- Should various sections be moved or remain in the inflation chapter?
- Constraints on the graviton
- Birefringence