@Filip_K As far as I can see the update is now online. Thank you very much for your effort!

@Filip_K

Thanks for your attention on this matter. Waiting for further updates from you and Windy!

@Filip_K As far as I can see the update is now online. Thank you very much for your effort!

@Filip_K

Thanks for your attention on this matter. Waiting for further updates from you and Windy!

@idefix37
At least in Open Data the operational IFS forecasts have been directly extended to 360 hours without any change on the data location. Example: https://data.ecmwf.int/forecasts/20241117/00z/ifs/0p25/oper/

Technically it could be working out differently in paid real-time subscriptions, which I have no knowledge about. But even if you can't manage to get that data, you can use Open Data as a fallback option. Of course it's only a fallback since the resolution is lower, but compared to AIFS (which is also in 0.25-deg resolution) it won't be worse.

@idefix37

I believe you are misinterpreting the documentation provided by ECMWF. In fact, the text in the red box highlighted by you has said exactly that there is no distinct "HRES" (which formerly provided 10-day forecast) any more, and "HRES" is now the same as the ensemble control, which goes up to 15 days.

This. In my experience the AIFS forecasts after +240 is subject to a certain amount of model bias and is nearly useless for a number of locations including PNW where I'm living. It'd be a decent improvement for Windy to replace those forecasts with the updated ECMWF IFS.